Links
- Email me
- A Pinko Hockey Player
- The Phischkneght Forum
- PhischkneghtX
- Confessions of a Budding Entrepreneur
Archives
- February 2004
- March 2004
- April 2004
- July 2004
- August 2004
- October 2004
- December 2004
- January 2005
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- July 2007
- November 2007
- January 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- October 2008
The observations and opinions of a person who has no discernible insights or ideas.
Tuesday, November 13, 2007
'How to Love Your Supplier' and other illegal activities
I sometimes talk with a debator I know about the similarities and differences between the government (especially the Federal Government) and private industry. He points out a lot of similarities that people might not realize without being more familiar with both of them, but we also find some stark differences.
Perhaps the biggest difference can be found in how they go about acquisition of parts and services. In private industry, purchasing is done with an eye to minimizing costs. Sometimes this is directed at long-term costs, and sometimes it has a more immediate focus. Low quality is sometimes considered as a cost in this sense, and is therefore sought to be reduced.
In the government, purchasing is driven by a substantial document called the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and its descendants in each of the departments and agencies of the government (e.g. the Defense FAR, or DFAR). The FAR is not so much tailored to reduce costs as it is to maintain fairness. It directs a lot of contracts to go to small businesses, in an effort to make things more fair to them. It severely limits the amount of corroboration that can exist between buyers and vendors.
One end result is that if government buyers tried to minimize costs in the ways that a private sector buyer might, then they could go to jail for it.
Perhaps the biggest difference can be found in how they go about acquisition of parts and services. In private industry, purchasing is done with an eye to minimizing costs. Sometimes this is directed at long-term costs, and sometimes it has a more immediate focus. Low quality is sometimes considered as a cost in this sense, and is therefore sought to be reduced.
In the government, purchasing is driven by a substantial document called the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and its descendants in each of the departments and agencies of the government (e.g. the Defense FAR, or DFAR). The FAR is not so much tailored to reduce costs as it is to maintain fairness. It directs a lot of contracts to go to small businesses, in an effort to make things more fair to them. It severely limits the amount of corroboration that can exist between buyers and vendors.
One end result is that if government buyers tried to minimize costs in the ways that a private sector buyer might, then they could go to jail for it.
- You are visitor