Links
- Email me
- A Pinko Hockey Player
- The Phischkneght Forum
- PhischkneghtX
- Confessions of a Budding Entrepreneur
Archives
- February 2004
- March 2004
- April 2004
- July 2004
- August 2004
- October 2004
- December 2004
- January 2005
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- July 2007
- November 2007
- January 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- October 2008
The observations and opinions of a person who has no discernible insights or ideas.
Monday, September 18, 2006
A Thousand Points of Dimness
I’ve been getting a lot of exposure to fringe theories lately. Part of this is due to a coworker who believes every half-baked anti-government theory to come around (which is ironic, considering his employer), but most of it is due to an old friend of mine who has come out as a Constitutionalist.
Prior to his conversion, I just figured that Constitutionalists were conservatives who favored a strictly literal interpretation of the Constitution. I’ve since discovered that they are not in favor of a strict interpretation of the Constitution, but rather they favor a return to the Constitution as originally written (except with no slavery, I suppose). What I also did not know is that many Constitutionalists are more paranoid than your average citizen. This leads to their fear of multinational governments and the New World Order and concern about “secret combinations” in our government.
With the exception of the New World Order theories (where some of the arguments are merely overly stretched and weak, rather than completely unfounded), there are rational, well-documented refutations to every claim made in any of the theories that I have looked at. This doesn’t matter, since to their subscribers, any evidence that refutes their claims only serves as evidence of how deep the conspiracy goes.
The following is a list of the theories I have studied, with some links to materials for our readers at home.
The Faking of the Apollo Moon Landing
Wikipedia page with point by point conspiracy claims and responses
Phil Plait's Bad Astronomy page with links to more refutations
The Government behind the events of September 11, 2001
Website for the video Loose Change about the conspiracy view of 9/11
Wikipedia site about Loose Change
Popular Mechanics rebuttal
The Income Tax Protesters
Bill Benson's webite puporting that income tax is not legal or required
We the People Foundation's website, an anti-income tax site
A very thorough, lengthy, legal-jargon-heavy refutation of the Income Tax Protester arguments
The New World Order
Quotes about the creation of the New World Order
Wikipedia site about the New World Order and used by Woodrow Wilson and George H. W. Bush
Wikipedia site about the New World Order as seen by conspiracy theorists
The Sanity of Lyndon LaRouche
Wikipedia article on LaRouche
"No Joke" an article about Lyndon LaRouche and his followers
Now, all of this weird stuff has been taking its toll on me. Last night, I dreamt that I met Lyndon LaRouche. So, I'm announcing my retirement from the world of conspiracy debunking. I'm pretty sure there's a lot more to life than having really, really logical arguments. And I plan on finding out what that is.
[Addendum: A member of the Constitution Party took exception to my description of their attitudes regarding the Constitution. He pointed out that they support most of the amendments, specifically the ones that they agree with. Excluded amendments include the 16th (dealing with income tax), 17th (direct election of senators), and sometimes the 14th (equal protection). I could go into great length as to why I disagree with the Constitution Party, but I don't want to get crazy again. 15 Feb 2007]
Prior to his conversion, I just figured that Constitutionalists were conservatives who favored a strictly literal interpretation of the Constitution. I’ve since discovered that they are not in favor of a strict interpretation of the Constitution, but rather they favor a return to the Constitution as originally written (except with no slavery, I suppose). What I also did not know is that many Constitutionalists are more paranoid than your average citizen. This leads to their fear of multinational governments and the New World Order and concern about “secret combinations” in our government.
With the exception of the New World Order theories (where some of the arguments are merely overly stretched and weak, rather than completely unfounded), there are rational, well-documented refutations to every claim made in any of the theories that I have looked at. This doesn’t matter, since to their subscribers, any evidence that refutes their claims only serves as evidence of how deep the conspiracy goes.
The following is a list of the theories I have studied, with some links to materials for our readers at home.
The Faking of the Apollo Moon Landing
Wikipedia page with point by point conspiracy claims and responses
Phil Plait's Bad Astronomy page with links to more refutations
The Government behind the events of September 11, 2001
Website for the video Loose Change about the conspiracy view of 9/11
Wikipedia site about Loose Change
Popular Mechanics rebuttal
The Income Tax Protesters
Bill Benson's webite puporting that income tax is not legal or required
We the People Foundation's website, an anti-income tax site
A very thorough, lengthy, legal-jargon-heavy refutation of the Income Tax Protester arguments
The New World Order
Quotes about the creation of the New World Order
Wikipedia site about the New World Order and used by Woodrow Wilson and George H. W. Bush
Wikipedia site about the New World Order as seen by conspiracy theorists
The Sanity of Lyndon LaRouche
Wikipedia article on LaRouche
"No Joke" an article about Lyndon LaRouche and his followers
Now, all of this weird stuff has been taking its toll on me. Last night, I dreamt that I met Lyndon LaRouche. So, I'm announcing my retirement from the world of conspiracy debunking. I'm pretty sure there's a lot more to life than having really, really logical arguments. And I plan on finding out what that is.
[Addendum: A member of the Constitution Party took exception to my description of their attitudes regarding the Constitution. He pointed out that they support most of the amendments, specifically the ones that they agree with. Excluded amendments include the 16th (dealing with income tax), 17th (direct election of senators), and sometimes the 14th (equal protection). I could go into great length as to why I disagree with the Constitution Party, but I don't want to get crazy again. 15 Feb 2007]
- You are visitor