Links
- Email me
- A Pinko Hockey Player
- The Phischkneght Forum
- PhischkneghtX
- Confessions of a Budding Entrepreneur
Archives
- February 2004
- March 2004
- April 2004
- July 2004
- August 2004
- October 2004
- December 2004
- January 2005
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- July 2007
- November 2007
- January 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- October 2008
The observations and opinions of a person who has no discernible insights or ideas.
Sunday, October 10, 2004
A Gibbous Weekend
As a college student, I almost never went to bed before 2 a.m. As a married guy with a full-time day job, I rarely stay up past midnight. What’s up with that?
The problem I’m running into is that on weekends, I have started slipping back into my old insomniac ways, sometimes staying up to 2 or so. Sure, it’s not like what I used to do, but then I’m supposed to be at work first thing in the morning on Mondays, and these weekend indiscretions take a lot out of me.
Why can’t I just sleep like a normal person?
The problem I’m running into is that on weekends, I have started slipping back into my old insomniac ways, sometimes staying up to 2 or so. Sure, it’s not like what I used to do, but then I’m supposed to be at work first thing in the morning on Mondays, and these weekend indiscretions take a lot out of me.
Why can’t I just sleep like a normal person?
Friday, October 08, 2004
Merging
Today, I got into a bit of a debate with my sister on the subject of merging. Both of us agree that Utahns can’t merge properly, but we disagree on what the right way to merge is.
Actually, we agree on the zipper method, and that merging should be done at or near cruising speeds. What we disagree on is when merging should take place. She feels (as I once did) that when made aware of an impending merge, drivers should get over as soon as possible so as to not cause problems with people having to stop for last second mergers (who often have cut ahead of dozens of cars in a nearly empty lane). The complaint, according to this line of thinking, is that the people who cut ahead have to come to a stop in order to merge, and therefore slow the whole group down. I objected to this sort of thing because the people who get ahead in the closing lane are jerks (I still feel that they’re jerks, but I’m not as scathing towards them now).
My position is that all lanes should be used until they close, at which point they can zipper evenly. This has the advantage of not prematurely crowding any lanes or leaving empty lanes to tempt greedy drivers. In fact, I think that you shouldn’t change lanes in thick traffic if you can help it. It just slows people down. If two lanes are zipping together at the merge, then they can time it properly and do it at a respectable speed, and both lanes move faster (although not as fast as a third lane would move).
The problem with doing things my way is that not enough people do it. We get nervous and get over early so that we don’t have to merge at the last minute. We resent the people who get ahead by staying in the doomed lane. In order for the full zipper effect to work and improve traffic flow, we have to overcome these mental barriers and stay where we have believed that only reprehensible people travel. Still, we must, if we ever want to make it through all this road construction.
I also discussed the war in Iraq with my sister, but there’s no meaningful conclusions that can be derived from debating that.
Actually, we agree on the zipper method, and that merging should be done at or near cruising speeds. What we disagree on is when merging should take place. She feels (as I once did) that when made aware of an impending merge, drivers should get over as soon as possible so as to not cause problems with people having to stop for last second mergers (who often have cut ahead of dozens of cars in a nearly empty lane). The complaint, according to this line of thinking, is that the people who cut ahead have to come to a stop in order to merge, and therefore slow the whole group down. I objected to this sort of thing because the people who get ahead in the closing lane are jerks (I still feel that they’re jerks, but I’m not as scathing towards them now).
My position is that all lanes should be used until they close, at which point they can zipper evenly. This has the advantage of not prematurely crowding any lanes or leaving empty lanes to tempt greedy drivers. In fact, I think that you shouldn’t change lanes in thick traffic if you can help it. It just slows people down. If two lanes are zipping together at the merge, then they can time it properly and do it at a respectable speed, and both lanes move faster (although not as fast as a third lane would move).
The problem with doing things my way is that not enough people do it. We get nervous and get over early so that we don’t have to merge at the last minute. We resent the people who get ahead by staying in the doomed lane. In order for the full zipper effect to work and improve traffic flow, we have to overcome these mental barriers and stay where we have believed that only reprehensible people travel. Still, we must, if we ever want to make it through all this road construction.
I also discussed the war in Iraq with my sister, but there’s no meaningful conclusions that can be derived from debating that.
- You are visitor